Angola Governance: Policy and Institutions
AO: CPIA: Business Regulatory Environment Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AO: CPIA: Business Regulatory Environment Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 2.000 NA in 2013. This stayed constant from the previous number of 2.000 NA for 2012. AO: CPIA: Business Regulatory Environment Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 2.000 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2013, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.000 NA in 2013 and a record low of 2.000 NA in 2013. AO: CPIA: Business Regulatory Environment Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. Business regulatory environment assesses the extent to which the legal, regulatory, and policy environments help or hinder private businesses in investing, creating jobs, and becoming more productive.;World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).;Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.000 2013 | yearly | 2005 - 2013 |
View Angola's AO: CPIA: Business Regulatory Environment Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2013 in the chart:
AO: CPIA: Debt Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AO: CPIA: Debt Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 3.000 NA in 2013. This stayed constant from the previous number of 3.000 NA for 2012. AO: CPIA: Debt Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 3.000 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2013, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.000 NA in 2013 and a record low of 2.000 NA in 2006. AO: CPIA: Debt Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. Debt policy assesses whether the debt management strategy is conducive to minimizing budgetary risks and ensuring long-term debt sustainability.;World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).;Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.000 2013 | yearly | 2005 - 2013 |
View Angola's AO: CPIA: Debt Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2013 in the chart:
AO: CPIA: Economic Management Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High
AO: CPIA: Economic Management Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 3.000 NA in 2013. This stayed constant from the previous number of 3.000 NA for 2012. AO: CPIA: Economic Management Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 3.000 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2013, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.000 NA in 2013 and a record low of 2.500 NA in 2005. AO: CPIA: Economic Management Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. The economic management cluster includes macroeconomic management, fiscal policy, and debt policy.;World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).;Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.000 2013 | yearly | 2005 - 2013 |
View Angola's AO: CPIA: Economic Management Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2013 in the chart:
AO: CPIA: Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AO: CPIA: Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 2.500 NA in 2013. This stayed constant from the previous number of 2.500 NA for 2012. AO: CPIA: Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 2.500 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2013, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.500 NA in 2013 and a record low of 2.500 NA in 2013. AO: CPIA: Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. Efficiency of revenue mobilization assesses the overall pattern of revenue mobilization--not only the de facto tax structure, but also revenue from all sources as actually collected.;World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).;Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.500 2013 | yearly | 2005 - 2013 |
View Angola's AO: CPIA: Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2013 in the chart:
AO: CPIA: Equity of Public Resource Use Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AO: CPIA: Equity of Public Resource Use Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 2.500 NA in 2013. This stayed constant from the previous number of 2.500 NA for 2012. AO: CPIA: Equity of Public Resource Use Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 2.500 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2013, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.500 NA in 2013 and a record low of 2.500 NA in 2013. AO: CPIA: Equity of Public Resource Use Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.;World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).;Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.500 2013 | yearly | 2005 - 2013 |
View Angola's AO: CPIA: Equity of Public Resource Use Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2013 in the chart:
AO: CPIA: Financial Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AO: CPIA: Financial Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 2.500 NA in 2013. This stayed constant from the previous number of 2.500 NA for 2012. AO: CPIA: Financial Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 2.500 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2013, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.500 NA in 2013 and a record low of 2.500 NA in 2013. AO: CPIA: Financial Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. Financial sector assesses the structure of the financial sector and the policies and regulations that affect it.;World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).;Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.500 2013 | yearly | 2005 - 2013 |
View Angola's AO: CPIA: Financial Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2013 in the chart:
AO: CPIA: Fiscal Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AO: CPIA: Fiscal Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 3.000 NA in 2013. This stayed constant from the previous number of 3.000 NA for 2012. AO: CPIA: Fiscal Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 3.000 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2013, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.000 NA in 2013 and a record low of 2.500 NA in 2005. AO: CPIA: Fiscal Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. Fiscal policy assesses the short- and medium-term sustainability of fiscal policy (taking into account monetary and exchange rate policy and the sustainability of the public debt) and its impact on growth.;World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).;Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.000 2013 | yearly | 2005 - 2013 |
View Angola's AO: CPIA: Fiscal Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2013 in the chart:
AO: CPIA: Gender Equality Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AO: CPIA: Gender Equality Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 3.000 NA in 2013. This stayed constant from the previous number of 3.000 NA for 2012. AO: CPIA: Gender Equality Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 3.000 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2013, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.500 NA in 2011 and a record low of 3.000 NA in 2013. AO: CPIA: Gender Equality Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. Gender equality assesses the extent to which the country has installed institutions and programs to enforce laws and policies that promote equal access for men and women in education, health, the economy, and protection under law.;World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).;Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.000 2013 | yearly | 2005 - 2013 |
View Angola's AO: CPIA: Gender Equality Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2013 in the chart:
AO: CPIA: Macroeconomic Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AO: CPIA: Macroeconomic Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 3.000 NA in 2013. This stayed constant from the previous number of 3.000 NA for 2012. AO: CPIA: Macroeconomic Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 3.000 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2013, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.000 NA in 2013 and a record low of 3.000 NA in 2013. AO: CPIA: Macroeconomic Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. Macroeconomic management assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and aggregate demand policy framework.;World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).;Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.000 2013 | yearly | 2005 - 2013 |
View Angola's AO: CPIA: Macroeconomic Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2013 in the chart:
AO: CPIA: Policy and Institutions For Environmental Sustainability Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AO: CPIA: Policy and Institutions For Environmental Sustainability Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 2.500 NA in 2013. This stayed constant from the previous number of 2.500 NA for 2012. AO: CPIA: Policy and Institutions For Environmental Sustainability Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 3.000 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2013, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.000 NA in 2010 and a record low of 2.500 NA in 2013. AO: CPIA: Policy and Institutions For Environmental Sustainability Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. Policy and institutions for environmental sustainability assess the extent to which environmental policies foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.;World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).;Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.500 2013 | yearly | 2005 - 2013 |
View Angola's AO: CPIA: Policy and Institutions For Environmental Sustainability Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2013 in the chart:
AO: CPIA: Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AO: CPIA: Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 2.000 NA in 2013. This stayed constant from the previous number of 2.000 NA for 2012. AO: CPIA: Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 2.000 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2013, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.000 NA in 2013 and a record low of 2.000 NA in 2013. AO: CPIA: Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. Property rights and rule-based governance assess the extent to which private economic activity is facilitated by an effective legal system and rule-based governance structure in which property and contract rights are reliably respected and enforced.;World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).;Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.000 2013 | yearly | 2005 - 2013 |
View Angola's AO: CPIA: Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2013 in the chart:
AO: CPIA: Public Sector Management and Institutions Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High
AO: CPIA: Public Sector Management and Institutions Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 2.300 NA in 2013. This stayed constant from the previous number of 2.300 NA for 2012. AO: CPIA: Public Sector Management and Institutions Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 2.400 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2013, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.400 NA in 2010 and a record low of 2.300 NA in 2013. AO: CPIA: Public Sector Management and Institutions Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. The public sector management and institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.;World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).;Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.300 2013 | yearly | 2005 - 2013 |
View Angola's AO: CPIA: Public Sector Management and Institutions Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2013 in the chart:
AO: CPIA: Quality of Public Administration Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AO: CPIA: Quality of Public Administration Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 2.000 NA in 2013. This stayed constant from the previous number of 2.000 NA for 2012. AO: CPIA: Quality of Public Administration Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 2.500 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2013, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.500 NA in 2010 and a record low of 2.000 NA in 2013. AO: CPIA: Quality of Public Administration Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. Quality of public administration assesses the extent to which civilian central government staff is structured to design and implement government policy and deliver services effectively.;World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).;Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.000 2013 | yearly | 2005 - 2013 |
View Angola's AO: CPIA: Quality of Public Administration Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2013 in the chart:
AO: CPIA: Social Protection Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AO: CPIA: Social Protection Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 2.500 NA in 2013. This stayed constant from the previous number of 2.500 NA for 2012. AO: CPIA: Social Protection Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 2.500 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2013, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.000 NA in 2009 and a record low of 2.500 NA in 2013. AO: CPIA: Social Protection Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. Social protection and labor assess government policies in social protection and labor market regulations that reduce the risk of becoming poor, assist those who are poor to better manage further risks, and ensure a minimal level of welfare to all people.;World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).;Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.500 2013 | yearly | 2005 - 2013 |
View Angola's AO: CPIA: Social Protection Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2013 in the chart:
AO: CPIA: Structural Policies Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High
AO: CPIA: Structural Policies Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 2.667 NA in 2013. This stayed constant from the previous number of 2.667 NA for 2012. AO: CPIA: Structural Policies Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 2.833 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2013, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.833 NA in 2010 and a record low of 2.667 NA in 2013. AO: CPIA: Structural Policies Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. The structural policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.;World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).;Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.667 2013 | yearly | 2005 - 2013 |
View Angola's AO: CPIA: Structural Policies Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2013 in the chart:
AO: CPIA: Trade Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AO: CPIA: Trade Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 3.500 NA in 2013. This stayed constant from the previous number of 3.500 NA for 2012. AO: CPIA: Trade Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 4.000 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2013, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.000 NA in 2010 and a record low of 3.500 NA in 2013. AO: CPIA: Trade Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. Trade assesses how the policy framework fosters trade in goods.;World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).;Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.500 2013 | yearly | 2005 - 2013 |
View Angola's AO: CPIA: Trade Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2013 in the chart:
AO: CPIA: Transparency: Accountability: and Corruption in The Public Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AO: CPIA: Transparency: Accountability: and Corruption in The Public Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 2.500 NA in 2013. This stayed constant from the previous number of 2.500 NA for 2012. AO: CPIA: Transparency: Accountability: and Corruption in The Public Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 2.500 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2013, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.500 NA in 2013 and a record low of 2.500 NA in 2013. AO: CPIA: Transparency: Accountability: and Corruption in The Public Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector assess the extent to which the executive can be held accountable for its use of funds and for the results of its actions by the electorate and by the legislature and judiciary, and the extent to which public employees within the executive are required to account for administrative decisions, use of resources, and results obtained. The three main dimensions assessed here are the accountability of the executive to oversight institutions and of public employees for their performance, access of civil society to information on public affairs, and state capture by narrow vested interests.;World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).;Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.500 2013 | yearly | 2005 - 2013 |
View Angola's AO: CPIA: Transparency: Accountability: and Corruption in The Public Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2013 in the chart:
AO: Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA): Building Human Resources Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AO: Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA): Building Human Resources Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 3.000 NA in 2013. This stayed constant from the previous number of 3.000 NA for 2012. AO: Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA): Building Human Resources Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 2.500 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2013, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.000 NA in 2013 and a record low of 2.500 NA in 2010. AO: Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA): Building Human Resources Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. Building human resources assesses the national policies and public and private sector service delivery that affect the access to and quality of health and education services, including prevention and treatment of HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria.;World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).;Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.000 2013 | yearly | 2005 - 2013 |
View Angola's AO: Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA): Building Human Resources Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2013 in the chart:
AO: Methodology Assessment of Statistical Capacity: Scale 0 - 100
AO: Methodology Assessment of Statistical Capacity: Scale 0 - 100 data was reported at 40.000 NA in 2020. This stayed constant from the previous number of 40.000 NA for 2019. AO: Methodology Assessment of Statistical Capacity: Scale 0 - 100 data is updated yearly, averaging 40.000 NA from Dec 2004 (Median) to 2020, with 17 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 60.000 NA in 2014 and a record low of 30.000 NA in 2017. AO: Methodology Assessment of Statistical Capacity: Scale 0 - 100 data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. The methodology indicator measures a country’s ability to adhere to internationally recommended standards and methods. The methodology score is calculated as the weighted average of 10 underlying indicator scores. The final methodology score contributes 1/3 of the overall Statistical Capacity Indicator score.;World Bank, Bulletin Board on Statistical Capacity (http://bbsc.worldbank.org).;Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 40.000 2020 | yearly | 2004 - 2020 |
View Angola's AO: Methodology Assessment of Statistical Capacity: Scale 0 - 100 from 2004 to 2020 in the chart:
AO: Overall Level of Statistical Capacity: Scale 0 - 100
AO: Overall Level of Statistical Capacity: Scale 0 - 100 data was reported at 45.556 NA in 2020. This records a decrease from the previous number of 48.889 NA for 2019. AO: Overall Level of Statistical Capacity: Scale 0 - 100 data is updated yearly, averaging 45.556 NA from Dec 2004 (Median) to 2020, with 17 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 50.000 NA in 2012 and a record low of 41.111 NA in 2004. AO: Overall Level of Statistical Capacity: Scale 0 - 100 data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. The Statistical Capacity Indicator is a composite score assessing the capacity of a country’s statistical system. It is based on a diagnostic framework assessing the following areas: methodology; data sources; and periodicity and timeliness. Countries are scored against 25 criteria in these areas, using publicly available information and/or country input. The overall Statistical Capacity score is then calculated as a simple average of all three area scores on a scale of 0-100.;World Bank, Bulletin Board on Statistical Capacity (http://bbsc.worldbank.org).;Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 45.556 2020 | yearly | 2004 - 2020 |
View Angola's AO: Overall Level of Statistical Capacity: Scale 0 - 100 from 2004 to 2020 in the chart:
AO: Periodicity and Timeliness Assessment of Statistical Capacity: Scale 0 - 100
AO: Periodicity and Timeliness Assessment of Statistical Capacity: Scale 0 - 100 data was reported at 66.667 NA in 2020. This stayed constant from the previous number of 66.667 NA for 2019. AO: Periodicity and Timeliness Assessment of Statistical Capacity: Scale 0 - 100 data is updated yearly, averaging 66.667 NA from Dec 2004 (Median) to 2020, with 17 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 83.333 NA in 2013 and a record low of 63.333 NA in 2004. AO: Periodicity and Timeliness Assessment of Statistical Capacity: Scale 0 - 100 data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. The periodicity and timeliness indicator assesses the availability and periodicity of key socioeconomic indicators. It measures the extent to which data are made accessible to users through transformation of source data into timely statistical outputs. The periodicity score is calculated as the weighted average of 10 underlying indicator scores. The final periodicity score contributes 1/3 of the overall Statistical Capacity Indicator score.;World Bank, Bulletin Board on Statistical Capacity (http://bbsc.worldbank.org).;Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 66.667 2020 | yearly | 2004 - 2020 |
View Angola's AO: Periodicity and Timeliness Assessment of Statistical Capacity: Scale 0 - 100 from 2004 to 2020 in the chart:
AO: Proportion of Seats Held by Women in National Parliaments
AO: Proportion of Seats Held by Women in National Parliaments data was reported at 33.636 % in 2023. This stayed constant from the previous number of 33.636 % for 2022. AO: Proportion of Seats Held by Women in National Parliaments data is updated yearly, averaging 30.000 % from Dec 1997 (Median) to 2023, with 27 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 38.636 % in 2010 and a record low of 9.545 % in 1997. AO: Proportion of Seats Held by Women in National Parliaments data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. Women in parliaments are the percentage of parliamentary seats in a single or lower chamber held by women.;Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) (www.ipu.org). For the year of 1998, the data is as of August 10, 1998.;Weighted average;Relevance to gender indicator: Women are vastly underrepresented in decision making positions in government, although there is some evidence of recent improvement. Gender parity in parliamentary representation is still far from being realized. Without representation at this level, it is difficult for women to influence policy. This is the Sustainable Development Goal indicator 5.5.1 (a). [https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/].
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 33.636 2023 | yearly | 1997 - 2023 |
View Angola's AO: Proportion of Seats Held by Women in National Parliaments from 1997 to 2023 in the chart:
AO: SPI: Pillar 1 Data Use Score: Scale 0-100
AO: SPI: Pillar 1 Data Use Score: Scale 0-100 data was reported at 80.000 NA in 2023. This stayed constant from the previous number of 80.000 NA for 2022. AO: SPI: Pillar 1 Data Use Score: Scale 0-100 data is updated yearly, averaging 40.000 NA from Dec 2004 (Median) to 2023, with 20 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 80.000 NA in 2023 and a record low of 20.000 NA in 2009. AO: SPI: Pillar 1 Data Use Score: Scale 0-100 data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. The data use overall score is a composite score measuring the demand side of the statistical system. The data use pillar is segmented by five types of users: (i) the legislature, (ii) the executive branch, (iii) civil society (including sub-national actors), (iv) academia and (v) international bodies. Each dimension would have associated indicators to measure performance. A mature system would score well across all dimensions whereas a less mature one would have weaker scores along certain dimensions. The gaps would give insights into prioritization among user groups and help answer questions as to why the existing services are not resulting in higher use of national statistics in a particular segment. Currently, the SPI only features indicators for one of the five dimensions of data use, which is data use by international organizations. Indicators on whether statistical systems are providing useful data to their national governments (legislature and executive branches), to civil society, and to academia are absent. Thus the dashboard does not yet assess if national statistical systems are meeting the data needs of a large swathe of users.;Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators);Weighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 80.000 2023 | yearly | 2004 - 2023 |
View Angola's AO: SPI: Pillar 1 Data Use Score: Scale 0-100 from 2004 to 2023 in the chart:
AO: SPI: Pillar 2 Data Services Score: Scale 0-100
AO: SPI: Pillar 2 Data Services Score: Scale 0-100 data was reported at 60.767 NA in 2023. This stayed constant from the previous number of 60.767 NA for 2022. AO: SPI: Pillar 2 Data Services Score: Scale 0-100 data is updated yearly, averaging 59.033 NA from Dec 2016 (Median) to 2023, with 8 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 62.700 NA in 2021 and a record low of 7.667 NA in 2016. AO: SPI: Pillar 2 Data Services Score: Scale 0-100 data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. The data services pillar overall score is a composite indicator based on four dimensions of data services: (i) the quality of data releases, (ii) the richness and openness of online access, (iii) the effectiveness of advisory and analytical services related to statistics, and (iv) the availability and use of data access services such as secure microdata access. Advisory and analytical services might incorporate elements related to data stewardship services including input to national data strategies, advice on data ethics and calling out misuse of data in accordance with the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics.;Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators);Weighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 60.767 2023 | yearly | 2016 - 2023 |
View Angola's AO: SPI: Pillar 2 Data Services Score: Scale 0-100 from 2016 to 2023 in the chart:
AO: SPI: Pillar 3 Data Products Score: Scale 0-100
AO: SPI: Pillar 3 Data Products Score: Scale 0-100 data was reported at 68.563 NA in 2019. This records a decrease from the previous number of 69.994 NA for 2018. AO: SPI: Pillar 3 Data Products Score: Scale 0-100 data is updated yearly, averaging 66.412 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2019, with 15 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 70.881 NA in 2017 and a record low of 59.506 NA in 2005. AO: SPI: Pillar 3 Data Products Score: Scale 0-100 data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. The data products overall score is a composite score measureing whether the country is able to produce relevant indicators, primarily related to SDGs. The data products (internal process) pillar is segmented by four topics and organized into (i) social, (ii) economic, (iii) environmental, and (iv) institutional dimensions using the typology of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This approach anchors the national statistical system’s performance around the essential data required to support the achievement of the 2030 global goals, and enables comparisons across countries so that a global view can be generated while enabling country specific emphasis to reflect the user needs of that country.;Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators);Weighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 68.563 2019 | yearly | 2005 - 2019 |
View Angola's AO: SPI: Pillar 3 Data Products Score: Scale 0-100 from 2005 to 2019 in the chart:
AO: SPI: Pillar 4 Data Sources Score: Scale 0-100
AO: SPI: Pillar 4 Data Sources Score: Scale 0-100 data was reported at 47.725 NA in 2023. This stayed constant from the previous number of 47.725 NA for 2022. AO: SPI: Pillar 4 Data Sources Score: Scale 0-100 data is updated yearly, averaging 43.900 NA from Dec 2015 (Median) to 2023, with 9 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 48.250 NA in 2021 and a record low of 35.567 NA in 2018. AO: SPI: Pillar 4 Data Sources Score: Scale 0-100 data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. The data sources overall score is a composity measure of whether countries have data available from the following sources: Censuses and surveys, administrative data, geospatial data, and private sector/citizen generated data. The data sources (input) pillar is segmented by four types of sources generated by (i) the statistical office (censuses and surveys), and sources accessed from elsewhere such as (ii) administrative data, (iii) geospatial data, and (iv) private sector data and citizen generated data. The appropriate balance between these source types will vary depending on a country’s institutional setting and the maturity of its statistical system. High scores should reflect the extent to which the sources being utilized enable the necessary statistical indicators to be generated. For example, a low score on environment statistics (in the data production pillar) may reflect a lack of use of (and low score for) geospatial data (in the data sources pillar). This type of linkage is inherent in the data cycle approach and can help highlight areas for investment required if country needs are to be met.;Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators);Weighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 47.725 2023 | yearly | 2015 - 2023 |
View Angola's AO: SPI: Pillar 4 Data Sources Score: Scale 0-100 from 2015 to 2023 in the chart:
AO: SPI: Pillar 5 Data Infrastructure Score: Scale 0-100
AO: SPI: Pillar 5 Data Infrastructure Score: Scale 0-100 data was reported at 40.000 NA in 2022. This stayed constant from the previous number of 40.000 NA for 2021. AO: SPI: Pillar 5 Data Infrastructure Score: Scale 0-100 data is updated yearly, averaging 40.000 NA from Dec 2016 (Median) to 2022, with 7 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 40.000 NA in 2022 and a record low of 35.000 NA in 2020. AO: SPI: Pillar 5 Data Infrastructure Score: Scale 0-100 data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. The data infrastructure pillar overall score measures the hard and soft infrastructure segments, itemizing essential cross cutting requirements for an effective statistical system. The segments are: (i) legislation and governance covering the existence of laws and a functioning institutional framework for the statistical system; (ii) standards and methods addressing compliance with recognized frameworks and concepts; (iii) skills including level of skills within the statistical system and among users (statistical literacy); (iv) partnerships reflecting the need for the statistical system to be inclusive and coherent; and (v) finance mobilized both domestically and from donors.;Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators);Weighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 40.000 2022 | yearly | 2016 - 2022 |
View Angola's AO: SPI: Pillar 5 Data Infrastructure Score: Scale 0-100 from 2016 to 2022 in the chart:
AO: Source Data Assessment of Statistical Capacity: Scale 0 - 100
AO: Source Data Assessment of Statistical Capacity: Scale 0 - 100 data was reported at 30.000 NA in 2020. This records a decrease from the previous number of 40.000 NA for 2019. AO: Source Data Assessment of Statistical Capacity: Scale 0 - 100 data is updated yearly, averaging 30.000 NA from Dec 2004 (Median) to 2020, with 17 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 40.000 NA in 2019 and a record low of 0.000 NA in 2013. AO: Source Data Assessment of Statistical Capacity: Scale 0 - 100 data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. The source data indicator reflects whether a country conducts data collection activities in line with internationally recommended periodicity, and whether data from administrative systems are available. The source data score is calculated as the weighted average of 5 underlying indicator scores. The final source data score contributes 1/3 of the overall Statistical Capacity Indicator score.;World Bank, Bulletin Board on Statistical Capacity (http://bbsc.worldbank.org).;Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 30.000 2020 | yearly | 2004 - 2020 |
View Angola's AO: Source Data Assessment of Statistical Capacity: Scale 0 - 100 from 2004 to 2020 in the chart:
AO: Statistical Performance Indicators (SPI): Overall Score: Scale 0-100
AO: Statistical Performance Indicators (SPI): Overall Score: Scale 0-100 data was reported at 62.276 NA in 2023. This records an increase from the previous number of 59.647 NA for 2022. AO: Statistical Performance Indicators (SPI): Overall Score: Scale 0-100 data is updated yearly, averaging 58.561 NA from Dec 2016 (Median) to 2023, with 8 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 62.276 NA in 2023 and a record low of 47.395 NA in 2016. AO: Statistical Performance Indicators (SPI): Overall Score: Scale 0-100 data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. The SPI overall score is a composite score measuing country performance across five pillars: data use, data services, data products, data sources, and data infrastructure.;Statistical Performance Indicators, The World Bank (https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/statistical-performance-indicators);Weighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 62.276 2023 | yearly | 2016 - 2023 |
View Angola's AO: Statistical Performance Indicators (SPI): Overall Score: Scale 0-100 from 2016 to 2023 in the chart:
AO: Women Business and the Law Index Score: scale 1-100
AO: Women Business and the Law Index Score: scale 1-100 data was reported at 79.375 NA in 2023. This stayed constant from the previous number of 79.375 NA for 2022. AO: Women Business and the Law Index Score: scale 1-100 data is updated yearly, averaging 56.250 NA from Dec 1970 (Median) to 2023, with 54 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 79.375 NA in 2023 and a record low of 30.625 NA in 1981. AO: Women Business and the Law Index Score: scale 1-100 data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Angola – Table AO.World Bank.WDI: Governance: Policy and Institutions. The index measures how laws and regulations affect women’s economic opportunity. Overall scores are calculated by taking the average score of each index (Mobility, Workplace, Pay, Marriage, Parenthood, Entrepreneurship, Assets and Pension), with 100 representing the highest possible score.;World Bank: Women, Business and the Law. https://wbl.worldbank.org/;;1. For the reference period, WDI and Gender Databases take the data coverage years instead of reporting years used in WBL (https://wbl.worldbank.org/). For example, the data for YR2020 in WBL (report year) corresponds to data for YR2019 in WDI and Gender Databases. 2. The 2024 Women, Business and the Law (WBL) report has introduced two distinct datasets, labeled as 1.0 and 2.0. The WBL data in the Gender database is based on the dataset 1.0. This dataset maintains consistency with the indicators used in previous WBL reports from 2020 to 2023. In contrast, the WBL 2.0 dataset includes new areas of childcare and safety. For those interested in exploring the WBL 2.0 dataset, it is available on the WBL website at https://wbl.worldbank.org.
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 79.375 2023 | yearly | 1970 - 2023 |