Latvia Transportation
Latvia LV: Air Transport: Freight
LV: Air Transport: Freight data was reported at 2.832 Ton-km mn in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 2.157 Ton-km mn for 2016. LV: Air Transport: Freight data is updated yearly, averaging 2.052 Ton-km mn from Dec 1992 (Median) to 2017, with 26 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 18.375 Ton-km mn in 2009 and a record low of 0.400 Ton-km mn in 1999. LV: Air Transport: Freight data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table LV.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Air freight is the volume of freight, express, and diplomatic bags carried on each flight stage (operation of an aircraft from takeoff to its next landing), measured in metric tons times kilometers traveled.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.16 2016 | yearly | 1992 - 2016 |
View Latvia's Latvia LV: Air Transport: Freight from 1992 to 2016 in the chart:
Latvia LV: Air Transport: Passengers Carried
LV: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data was reported at 3,441,024.000 Person in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 2,843,133.000 Person for 2016. LV: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data is updated yearly, averaging 812,895.000 Person from Dec 1992 (Median) to 2017, with 26 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3,441,024.000 Person in 2017 and a record low of 65,700.000 Person in 1992. LV: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table LV.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Air passengers carried include both domestic and international aircraft passengers of air carriers registered in the country.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2,884,091.64 2016 | yearly | 1992 - 2016 |
View Latvia's Latvia LV: Air Transport: Passengers Carried from 1992 to 2016 in the chart:
Latvia LV: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide
LV: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data was reported at 47,885.000 Unit in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 42,392.000 Unit for 2016. LV: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data is updated yearly, averaging 19,635.500 Unit from Dec 1992 (Median) to 2017, with 26 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 54,589.000 Unit in 2010 and a record low of 800.000 Unit in 1992. LV: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table LV.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Registered carrier departures worldwide are domestic takeoffs and takeoffs abroad of air carriers registered in the country.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 42,718.00 2016 | yearly | 1992 - 2016 |
View Latvia's Latvia LV: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide from 1992 to 2016 in the chart:
Latvia LV: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient
LV: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data was reported at 4.300 NA in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 4.600 NA for 2016. LV: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data is updated yearly, averaging 4.240 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2017, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.600 NA in 2016 and a record low of 4.100 NA in 2012. LV: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Latvia – Table LV.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Burden of Customs Procedure measures business executives' perceptions of their country's efficiency of customs procedures. The rating ranges from 1 to 7, with a higher score indicating greater efficiency. Data are from the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey, conducted for 30 years in collaboration with 150 partner institutes. The 2009 round included more than 13,000 respondents from 133 countries. Sampling follows a dual stratification based on company size and the sector of activity. Data are collected online or through in-person interviews. Responses are aggregated using sector-weighted averaging. The data for the latest year are combined with the data for the previous year to create a two-year moving average. Respondents evaluated the efficiency of customs procedures in their country. The lowest score (1) rates the customs procedure as extremely inefficient, and the highest score (7) as extremely efficient.; ; World Economic Forum, Global Competiveness Report and data files.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 4.30 2017 | yearly | 2007 - 2017 |
View Latvia's Latvia LV: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient from 2007 to 2017 in the chart:
Latvia LV: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units)
LV: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) data was reported at 448,533.000 TEU in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 388,433.000 TEU for 2016. LV: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) data is updated yearly, averaging 359,390.000 TEU from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2017, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 448,533.000 TEU in 2017 and a record low of 184,399.000 TEU in 2009. LV: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Latvia – Table LV.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Port container traffic measures the flow of containers from land to sea transport modes., and vice versa, in twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs), a standard-size container. Data refer to coastal shipping as well as international journeys. Transshipment traffic is counted as two lifts at the intermediate port (once to off-load and again as an outbound lift) and includes empty units.; ; UNCTAD (http://unctad.org/en/Pages/statistics.aspx); Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 388,433.00 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Latvia's Latvia LV: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Latvia LV: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100
LV: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 data was reported at 3.620 NA in 2016. This stayed constant from the previous number of 3.620 NA for 2015. LV: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 data is updated yearly, averaging 5.450 NA from Dec 2004 (Median) to 2016, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 6.370 NA in 2004 and a record low of 3.620 NA in 2016. LV: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Latvia – Table LV.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. The Liner Shipping Connectivity Index captures how well countries are connected to global shipping networks. It is computed by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) based on five components of the maritime transport sector: number of ships, their container-carrying capacity, maximum vessel size, number of services, and number of companies that deploy container ships in a country's ports. For each component a country's value is divided by the maximum value of each component in 2004, the five components are averaged for each country, and the average is divided by the maximum average for 2004 and multiplied by 100. The index generates a value of 100 for the country with the highest average index in 2004. . The underlying data come from Containerisation International Online.; ; United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Review of Maritime Transport 2010.; ;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.62 2016 | yearly | 2004 - 2016 |
View Latvia's Latvia LV: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 from 2004 to 2016 in the chart:
Latvia LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments
LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data was reported at 3.423 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.503 NA for 2014. LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data is updated yearly, averaging 3.423 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.550 NA in 2010 and a record low of 2.970 NA in 2012. LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Latvia – Table LV.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the ability to track and trace consignments when shipping to the market, on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.42 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Latvia's Latvia LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Latvia LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services
LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data was reported at 3.292 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 3.209 NA for 2014. LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data is updated yearly, averaging 2.960 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.292 NA in 2016 and a record low of 2.640 NA in 2012. LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Latvia – Table LV.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the overall level of competence and quality of logistics services (e.g. transport operators, customs brokers), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.29 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Latvia's Latvia LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Latvia LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments
LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data was reported at 3.278 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.376 NA for 2014. LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data is updated yearly, averaging 3.310 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.380 NA in 2010 and a record low of 2.720 NA in 2012. LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Latvia – Table LV.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents assessed the ease of arranging competitively priced shipments to markets, on a rating ranging from 1 (very difficult) to 5 (very easy). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.28 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Latvia's Latvia LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Latvia LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process
LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data was reported at 3.111 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.222 NA for 2014. LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data is updated yearly, averaging 2.940 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.222 NA in 2014 and a record low of 2.530 NA in 2007. LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Latvia – Table LV.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated efficiency of customs clearance processes (i.e. speed, simplicity and predictability of formalities), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.11 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Latvia's Latvia LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Latvia LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time
LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data was reported at 3.622 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 4.059 NA for 2014. LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data is updated yearly, averaging 3.690 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.059 NA in 2014 and a record low of 3.080 NA in 2012. LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Latvia – Table LV.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents assessed how often the shipments to assessed markets reach the consignee within the scheduled or expected delivery time, on a rating ranging from 1 (hardly ever) to 5 (nearly always). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.62 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Latvia's Latvia LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Latvia LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall
LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data was reported at 3.327 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.403 NA for 2014. LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data is updated yearly, averaging 3.250 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.403 NA in 2014 and a record low of 2.780 NA in 2012. LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Latvia – Table LV.World Bank: Transportation. Logistics Performance Index overall score reflects perceptions of a country's logistics based on efficiency of customs clearance process, quality of trade- and transport-related infrastructure, ease of arranging competitively priced shipments, quality of logistics services, ability to track and trace consignments, and frequency with which shipments reach the consignee within the scheduled time. The index ranges from 1 to 5, with a higher score representing better performance. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Scores for the six areas are averaged across all respondents and aggregated to a single score using principal components analysis. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010).; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.33 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Latvia's Latvia LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Latvia LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure
LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data was reported at 3.235 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 3.029 NA for 2014. LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data is updated yearly, averaging 2.880 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.235 NA in 2016 and a record low of 2.520 NA in 2012. LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Latvia – Table LV.World Bank: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the quality of trade and transport related infrastructure (e.g. ports, railroads, roads, information technology), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.24 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Latvia's Latvia LV: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Latvia LV: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter
LV: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data was reported at 1.070 USD in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 1.490 USD for 2014. LV: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data is updated yearly, averaging 1.070 USD from Dec 1995 (Median) to 2016, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.770 USD in 2012 and a record low of 0.340 USD in 1995. LV: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Latvia – Table LV.World Bank: Transportation. Fuel prices refer to the pump prices of the most widely sold grade of diesel fuel. Prices have been converted from the local currency to U.S. dollars.; ; German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ).; Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 1.07 2016 | yearly | 1995 - 2016 |
View Latvia's Latvia LV: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter from 1995 to 2016 in the chart:
Latvia LV: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter
LV: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data was reported at 1.160 USD in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 1.480 USD for 2014. LV: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data is updated yearly, averaging 1.120 USD from Dec 1995 (Median) to 2016, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.800 USD in 2012 and a record low of 0.410 USD in 1995. LV: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Latvia – Table LV.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Fuel prices refer to the pump prices of the most widely sold grade of gasoline. Prices have been converted from the local currency to U.S. dollars.; ; German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ).; Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 1.16 2016 | yearly | 1995 - 2016 |
View Latvia's Latvia LV: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter from 1995 to 2016 in the chart:
Latvia LV: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards
LV: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data was reported at 5.100 NA in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 5.200 NA for 2016. LV: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data is updated yearly, averaging 4.800 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2017, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 5.200 NA in 2016 and a record low of 4.375 NA in 2008. LV: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Latvia – Table LV.World Bank: Transportation. The Quality of Port Infrastructure measures business executives' perception of their country's port facilities. Data are from the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey, conducted for 30 years in collaboration with 150 partner institutes. The 2009 round included more than 13,000 respondents from 133 countries. Sampling follows a dual stratification based on company size and the sector of activity. Data are collected online or through in-person interviews. Responses are aggregated using sector-weighted averaging. The data for the latest year are combined with the data for the previous year to create a two-year moving average. Scores range from 1 (port infrastructure considered extremely underdeveloped) to 7 (port infrastructure considered efficient by international standards). Respondents in landlocked countries were asked how accessible are port facilities (1 = extremely inaccessible; 7 = extremely accessible).; ; World Economic Forum, Global Competiveness Report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 5.10 2017 | yearly | 2007 - 2017 |
View Latvia's Latvia LV: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards from 2007 to 2017 in the chart:
Latvia LV: Rail Lines: Total Route-Km
LV: Rail Lines: Total Route-Km data was reported at 1,859.600 km in 2016. This stayed constant from the previous number of 1,859.600 km for 2015. LV: Rail Lines: Total Route-Km data is updated yearly, averaging 2,379.500 km from Dec 1980 (Median) to 2016, with 34 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2,417.000 km in 1999 and a record low of 1,859.000 km in 2014. LV: Rail Lines: Total Route-Km data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Latvia – Table LV.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Rail lines are the length of railway route available for train service, irrespective of the number of parallel tracks.; ; Internation Union of Railways (UIC); Sum; Aggregates are based on gap-filled data.
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 1,859.60 2016 | yearly | 1980 - 2016 |
View Latvia's Latvia LV: Rail Lines: Total Route-Km from 1980 to 2016 in the chart:
Latvia LV: Railways: Goods Transported
LV: Railways: Goods Transported data was reported at 11,838.000 Ton-km mn in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 13,023.000 Ton-km mn for 2015. LV: Railways: Goods Transported data is updated yearly, averaging 16,877.000 Ton-km mn from Dec 1980 (Median) to 2016, with 37 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 21,689.000 Ton-km mn in 1988 and a record low of 9,520.000 Ton-km mn in 1994. LV: Railways: Goods Transported data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Latvia – Table LV.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Goods transported by railway are the volume of goods transported by railway, measured in metric tons times kilometers traveled.; ; Internation Union of Railways (UIC); Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 11,838.00 2016 | yearly | 1980 - 2016 |
View Latvia's Latvia LV: Railways: Goods Transported from 1980 to 2016 in the chart:
Latvia LV: Railways: Passengers Carried
LV: Railways: Passengers Carried data was reported at 40.200 Person-km mn in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 591.000 Person-km mn for 2015. LV: Railways: Passengers Carried data is updated yearly, averaging 1,100.000 Person-km mn from Dec 1980 (Median) to 2016, with 37 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 5,761.000 Person-km mn in 1988 and a record low of 40.200 Person-km mn in 2016. LV: Railways: Passengers Carried data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Latvia – Table LV.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Passengers carried by railway are the number of passengers transported by rail times kilometers traveled.; ; Internation Union of Railways (UIC); Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 40.20 2016 | yearly | 1980 - 2016 |