Poland Transportation
Poland PL: Air Transport: Freight
PL: Air Transport: Freight data was reported at 221.814 Ton-km mn in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 155.552 Ton-km mn for 2016. PL: Air Transport: Freight data is updated yearly, averaging 49.100 Ton-km mn from Dec 1970 (Median) to 2017, with 48 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 221.814 Ton-km mn in 2017 and a record low of 4.200 Ton-km mn in 1982. PL: Air Transport: Freight data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table PL.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Air freight is the volume of freight, express, and diplomatic bags carried on each flight stage (operation of an aircraft from takeoff to its next landing), measured in metric tons times kilometers traveled.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 221.81 2017 | yearly | 1970 - 2017 |
View Poland's Poland PL: Air Transport: Freight from 1970 to 2017 in the chart:
Poland PL: Air Transport: Passengers Carried
PL: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data was reported at 7,376,934.000 Person in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 5,497,163.000 Person for 2016. PL: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data is updated yearly, averaging 1,758,200.000 Person from Dec 1970 (Median) to 2017, with 48 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 7,376,934.000 Person in 2017 and a record low of 755,500.000 Person in 1982. PL: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table PL.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Air passengers carried include both domestic and international aircraft passengers of air carriers registered in the country.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 7,376,934.00 2017 | yearly | 1970 - 2017 |
View Poland's Poland PL: Air Transport: Passengers Carried from 1970 to 2017 in the chart:
Poland PL: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide
PL: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data was reported at 106,427.000 Unit in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 84,075.000 Unit for 2016. PL: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data is updated yearly, averaging 38,350.000 Unit from Dec 1970 (Median) to 2017, with 48 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 106,427.000 Unit in 2017 and a record low of 16,400.000 Unit in 1982. PL: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table PL.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Registered carrier departures worldwide are domestic takeoffs and takeoffs abroad of air carriers registered in the country.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 106,427.00 2017 | yearly | 1970 - 2017 |
View Poland's Poland PL: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide from 1970 to 2017 in the chart:
Poland PL: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient
PL: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data was reported at 4.600 NA in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 4.400 NA for 2016. PL: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data is updated yearly, averaging 4.300 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2017, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.600 NA in 2017 and a record low of 3.767 NA in 2008. PL: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Poland – Table PL.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Burden of Customs Procedure measures business executives' perceptions of their country's efficiency of customs procedures. The rating ranges from 1 to 7, with a higher score indicating greater efficiency. Data are from the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey, conducted for 30 years in collaboration with 150 partner institutes. The 2009 round included more than 13,000 respondents from 133 countries. Sampling follows a dual stratification based on company size and the sector of activity. Data are collected online or through in-person interviews. Responses are aggregated using sector-weighted averaging. The data for the latest year are combined with the data for the previous year to create a two-year moving average. Respondents evaluated the efficiency of customs procedures in their country. The lowest score (1) rates the customs procedure as extremely inefficient, and the highest score (7) as extremely efficient.; ; World Economic Forum, Global Competiveness Report and data files.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 4.60 2017 | yearly | 2007 - 2017 |
View Poland's Poland PL: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient from 2007 to 2017 in the chart:
Poland PL: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units)
PL: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) data was reported at 2,459,900.000 TEU in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 2,028,577.000 TEU for 2016. PL: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) data is updated yearly, averaging 1,205,542.000 TEU from Dec 2001 (Median) to 2017, with 14 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2,459,900.000 TEU in 2017 and a record low of 261,419.000 TEU in 2001. PL: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Poland – Table PL.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Port container traffic measures the flow of containers from land to sea transport modes., and vice versa, in twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs), a standard-size container. Data refer to coastal shipping as well as international journeys. Transshipment traffic is counted as two lifts at the intermediate port (once to off-load and again as an outbound lift) and includes empty units.; ; UNCTAD (http://unctad.org/en/Pages/statistics.aspx); Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2,028,577.00 2016 | yearly | 2001 - 2016 |
View Poland's Poland PL: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) from 2001 to 2016 in the chart:
Poland PL: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100
PL: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 data was reported at 52.500 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 51.190 NA for 2015. PL: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 data is updated yearly, averaging 26.180 NA from Dec 2004 (Median) to 2016, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 52.500 NA in 2016 and a record low of 7.280 NA in 2004. PL: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Poland – Table PL.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. The Liner Shipping Connectivity Index captures how well countries are connected to global shipping networks. It is computed by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) based on five components of the maritime transport sector: number of ships, their container-carrying capacity, maximum vessel size, number of services, and number of companies that deploy container ships in a country's ports. For each component a country's value is divided by the maximum value of each component in 2004, the five components are averaged for each country, and the average is divided by the maximum average for 2004 and multiplied by 100. The index generates a value of 100 for the country with the highest average index in 2004. . The underlying data come from Containerisation International Online.; ; United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Review of Maritime Transport 2010.; ;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 52.50 2016 | yearly | 2004 - 2016 |
View Poland's Poland PL: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 from 2004 to 2016 in the chart:
Poland PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments
PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data was reported at 3.456 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.543 NA for 2014. PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data is updated yearly, averaging 3.450 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.543 NA in 2014 and a record low of 3.120 NA in 2007. PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Poland – Table PL.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the ability to track and trace consignments when shipping to the market, on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.46 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Poland's Poland PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Poland PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services
PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data was reported at 3.388 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.465 NA for 2014. PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data is updated yearly, averaging 3.300 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.465 NA in 2014 and a record low of 3.040 NA in 2007. PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Poland – Table PL.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the overall level of competence and quality of logistics services (e.g. transport operators, customs brokers), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.39 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Poland's Poland PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Poland PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments
PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data was reported at 3.438 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.457 NA for 2014. PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data is updated yearly, averaging 3.438 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.470 NA in 2012 and a record low of 2.920 NA in 2007. PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Poland – Table PL.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents assessed the ease of arranging competitively priced shipments to markets, on a rating ranging from 1 (very difficult) to 5 (very easy). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.44 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Poland's Poland PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Poland PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process
PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data was reported at 3.267 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 3.255 NA for 2014. PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data is updated yearly, averaging 3.255 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.300 NA in 2012 and a record low of 2.880 NA in 2007. PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Poland – Table PL.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated efficiency of customs clearance processes (i.e. speed, simplicity and predictability of formalities), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.27 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Poland's Poland PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Poland PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time
PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data was reported at 3.804 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 4.133 NA for 2014. PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data is updated yearly, averaging 4.040 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.520 NA in 2010 and a record low of 3.590 NA in 2007. PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Poland – Table PL.World Bank: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents assessed how often the shipments to assessed markets reach the consignee within the scheduled or expected delivery time, on a rating ranging from 1 (hardly ever) to 5 (nearly always). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.80 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Poland's Poland PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Poland PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall
PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data was reported at 3.426 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.494 NA for 2014. PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data is updated yearly, averaging 3.430 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.494 NA in 2014 and a record low of 3.040 NA in 2007. PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Poland – Table PL.World Bank: Transportation. Logistics Performance Index overall score reflects perceptions of a country's logistics based on efficiency of customs clearance process, quality of trade- and transport-related infrastructure, ease of arranging competitively priced shipments, quality of logistics services, ability to track and trace consignments, and frequency with which shipments reach the consignee within the scheduled time. The index ranges from 1 to 5, with a higher score representing better performance. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Scores for the six areas are averaged across all respondents and aggregated to a single score using principal components analysis. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010).; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.43 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Poland's Poland PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Poland PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure
PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data was reported at 3.169 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 3.083 NA for 2014. PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data is updated yearly, averaging 3.083 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.169 NA in 2016 and a record low of 2.690 NA in 2007. PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Poland – Table PL.World Bank: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the quality of trade and transport related infrastructure (e.g. ports, railroads, roads, information technology), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.17 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Poland's Poland PL: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Poland PL: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter
PL: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data was reported at 1.040 USD in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 1.390 USD for 2014. PL: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data is updated yearly, averaging 1.090 USD from Dec 1995 (Median) to 2016, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.730 USD in 2012 and a record low of 0.420 USD in 1995. PL: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Poland – Table PL.World Bank: Transportation. Fuel prices refer to the pump prices of the most widely sold grade of diesel fuel. Prices have been converted from the local currency to U.S. dollars.; ; German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ).; Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 1.04 2016 | yearly | 1995 - 2016 |
View Poland's Poland PL: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter from 1995 to 2016 in the chart:
Poland PL: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter
PL: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data was reported at 1.070 USD in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 1.420 USD for 2014. PL: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data is updated yearly, averaging 1.200 USD from Dec 1995 (Median) to 2016, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.740 USD in 2012 and a record low of 0.540 USD in 1998. PL: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Poland – Table PL.World Bank: Transportation. Fuel prices refer to the pump prices of the most widely sold grade of gasoline. Prices have been converted from the local currency to U.S. dollars.; ; German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ).; Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 1.07 2016 | yearly | 1995 - 2016 |
View Poland's Poland PL: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter from 1995 to 2016 in the chart:
Poland PL: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards
PL: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data was reported at 4.200 NA in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 4.000 NA for 2016. PL: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data is updated yearly, averaging 3.500 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2017, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.200 NA in 2017 and a record low of 2.621 NA in 2008. PL: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Poland – Table PL.World Bank: Transportation. The Quality of Port Infrastructure measures business executives' perception of their country's port facilities. Data are from the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey, conducted for 30 years in collaboration with 150 partner institutes. The 2009 round included more than 13,000 respondents from 133 countries. Sampling follows a dual stratification based on company size and the sector of activity. Data are collected online or through in-person interviews. Responses are aggregated using sector-weighted averaging. The data for the latest year are combined with the data for the previous year to create a two-year moving average. Scores range from 1 (port infrastructure considered extremely underdeveloped) to 7 (port infrastructure considered efficient by international standards). Respondents in landlocked countries were asked how accessible are port facilities (1 = extremely inaccessible; 7 = extremely accessible).; ; World Economic Forum, Global Competiveness Report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 4.20 2017 | yearly | 2007 - 2017 |
View Poland's Poland PL: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards from 2007 to 2017 in the chart:
Poland PL: Rail Lines: Total Route-Km
PL: Rail Lines: Total Route-Km data was reported at 18,429.000 km in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 18,510.000 km for 2015. PL: Rail Lines: Total Route-Km data is updated yearly, averaging 22,422.500 km from Dec 1980 (Median) to 2016, with 36 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 27,185.000 km in 1980 and a record low of 18,429.000 km in 2016. PL: Rail Lines: Total Route-Km data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Poland – Table PL.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Rail lines are the length of railway route available for train service, irrespective of the number of parallel tracks.; ; Internation Union of Railways (UIC); Sum; Aggregates are based on gap-filled data.
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 18,429.00 2016 | yearly | 1980 - 2016 |
View Poland's Poland PL: Rail Lines: Total Route-Km from 1980 to 2016 in the chart:
Poland PL: Railways: Goods Transported
PL: Railways: Goods Transported data was reported at 28,720.000 Ton-km mn in 2015. This records a decrease from the previous number of 32,017.000 Ton-km mn for 2014. PL: Railways: Goods Transported data is updated yearly, averaging 59,723.500 Ton-km mn from Dec 1980 (Median) to 2015, with 36 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 132,576.000 Ton-km mn in 1980 and a record low of 28,720.000 Ton-km mn in 2015. PL: Railways: Goods Transported data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Poland – Table PL.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Goods transported by railway are the volume of goods transported by railway, measured in metric tons times kilometers traveled.; ; Internation Union of Railways (UIC); Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 28,720.00 2015 | yearly | 1980 - 2015 |
View Poland's Poland PL: Railways: Goods Transported from 1980 to 2015 in the chart:
Poland PL: Railways: Passengers Carried
PL: Railways: Passengers Carried data was reported at 9,466.300 Person-km mn in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 10,117.000 Person-km mn for 2015. PL: Railways: Passengers Carried data is updated yearly, averaging 25,795.000 Person-km mn from Dec 1980 (Median) to 2016, with 37 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 55,888.000 Person-km mn in 1989 and a record low of 9,466.300 Person-km mn in 2016. PL: Railways: Passengers Carried data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Poland – Table PL.World Bank: Transportation. Passengers carried by railway are the number of passengers transported by rail times kilometers traveled.; ; Internation Union of Railways (UIC); Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 9,466.30 2016 | yearly | 1980 - 2016 |