Uganda Transportation
Uganda UG: Air Transport: Freight
UG: Air Transport: Freight data was reported at 0.022 Ton-km mn in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 0.023 Ton-km mn for 2016. UG: Air Transport: Freight data is updated yearly, averaging 8.950 Ton-km mn from Dec 1970 (Median) to 2017, with 44 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 33.975 Ton-km mn in 2006 and a record low of 0.022 Ton-km mn in 2017. UG: Air Transport: Freight data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table UG.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Air freight is the volume of freight, express, and diplomatic bags carried on each flight stage (operation of an aircraft from takeoff to its next landing), measured in metric tons times kilometers traveled.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0.02 2017 | yearly | 1970 - 2017 |
View Uganda's Uganda UG: Air Transport: Freight from 1970 to 2017 in the chart:
Uganda UG: Air Transport: Passengers Carried
UG: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data was reported at 54,937.000 Person in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 52,187.000 Person for 2016. UG: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data is updated yearly, averaging 62,600.000 Person from Dec 1970 (Median) to 2017, with 45 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 198,804.000 Person in 2013 and a record low of 26,300.000 Person in 1991. UG: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table UG.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Air passengers carried include both domestic and international aircraft passengers of air carriers registered in the country.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 54,937.00 2017 | yearly | 1970 - 2017 |
View Uganda's Uganda UG: Air Transport: Passengers Carried from 1970 to 2017 in the chart:
Uganda UG: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide
UG: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data was reported at 4,233.000 Unit in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 3,828.000 Unit for 2016. UG: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data is updated yearly, averaging 1,700.000 Unit from Dec 1970 (Median) to 2017, with 45 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 10,500.000 Unit in 1970 and a record low of 263.000 Unit in 2003. UG: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table UG.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Registered carrier departures worldwide are domestic takeoffs and takeoffs abroad of air carriers registered in the country.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 4,233.00 2017 | yearly | 1970 - 2017 |
View Uganda's Uganda UG: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide from 1970 to 2017 in the chart:
Uganda UG: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient
UG: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data was reported at 4.200 NA in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 4.000 NA for 2016. UG: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data is updated yearly, averaging 4.000 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2017, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.400 NA in 2011 and a record low of 3.114 NA in 2008. UG: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uganda – Table UG.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Burden of Customs Procedure measures business executives' perceptions of their country's efficiency of customs procedures. The rating ranges from 1 to 7, with a higher score indicating greater efficiency. Data are from the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey, conducted for 30 years in collaboration with 150 partner institutes. The 2009 round included more than 13,000 respondents from 133 countries. Sampling follows a dual stratification based on company size and the sector of activity. Data are collected online or through in-person interviews. Responses are aggregated using sector-weighted averaging. The data for the latest year are combined with the data for the previous year to create a two-year moving average. Respondents evaluated the efficiency of customs procedures in their country. The lowest score (1) rates the customs procedure as extremely inefficient, and the highest score (7) as extremely efficient.; ; World Economic Forum, Global Competiveness Report and data files.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 4.20 2017 | yearly | 2007 - 2017 |
View Uganda's Uganda UG: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient from 2007 to 2017 in the chart:
Uganda UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments
UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data was reported at 3.009 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 2.450 NA for 2010. UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data is updated yearly, averaging 2.450 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 3 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.009 NA in 2016 and a record low of 2.330 NA in 2007. UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uganda – Table UG.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the ability to track and trace consignments when shipping to the market, on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.01 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Uganda's Uganda UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Uganda UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services
UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data was reported at 2.931 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 2.590 NA for 2010. UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data is updated yearly, averaging 2.590 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 3 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.931 NA in 2016 and a record low of 2.550 NA in 2007. UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uganda – Table UG.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the overall level of competence and quality of logistics services (e.g. transport operators, customs brokers), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.93 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Uganda's Uganda UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Uganda UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments
UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data was reported at 2.879 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.020 NA for 2010. UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data is updated yearly, averaging 2.879 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 3 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.020 NA in 2010 and a record low of 2.420 NA in 2007. UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uganda – Table UG.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents assessed the ease of arranging competitively priced shipments to markets, on a rating ranging from 1 (very difficult) to 5 (very easy). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.88 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Uganda's Uganda UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Uganda UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process
UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data was reported at 2.972 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 2.840 NA for 2010. UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data is updated yearly, averaging 2.840 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 3 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.972 NA in 2016 and a record low of 2.210 NA in 2007. UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uganda – Table UG.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated efficiency of customs clearance processes (i.e. speed, simplicity and predictability of formalities), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.97 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Uganda's Uganda UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Uganda UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time
UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data was reported at 3.698 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 3.520 NA for 2010. UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data is updated yearly, averaging 3.520 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 3 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.698 NA in 2016 and a record low of 3.290 NA in 2007. UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uganda – Table UG.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents assessed how often the shipments to assessed markets reach the consignee within the scheduled or expected delivery time, on a rating ranging from 1 (hardly ever) to 5 (nearly always). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.70 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Uganda's Uganda UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Uganda UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall
UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data was reported at 3.043 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 2.820 NA for 2010. UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data is updated yearly, averaging 2.820 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 3 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.043 NA in 2016 and a record low of 2.490 NA in 2007. UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uganda – Table UG.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Logistics Performance Index overall score reflects perceptions of a country's logistics based on efficiency of customs clearance process, quality of trade- and transport-related infrastructure, ease of arranging competitively priced shipments, quality of logistics services, ability to track and trace consignments, and frequency with which shipments reach the consignee within the scheduled time. The index ranges from 1 to 5, with a higher score representing better performance. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Scores for the six areas are averaged across all respondents and aggregated to a single score using principal components analysis. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010).; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.04 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Uganda's Uganda UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Uganda UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure
UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data was reported at 2.740 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 2.350 NA for 2010. UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data is updated yearly, averaging 2.350 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 3 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.740 NA in 2016 and a record low of 2.170 NA in 2007. UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uganda – Table UG.World Bank: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the quality of trade and transport related infrastructure (e.g. ports, railroads, roads, information technology), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.74 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Uganda's Uganda UG: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Uganda UG: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter
UG: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data was reported at 0.790 USD in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 1.110 USD for 2014. UG: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data is updated yearly, averaging 0.850 USD from Dec 1991 (Median) to 2016, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.350 USD in 2012 and a record low of 0.550 USD in 1991. UG: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uganda – Table UG.World Bank: Transportation. Fuel prices refer to the pump prices of the most widely sold grade of diesel fuel. Prices have been converted from the local currency to U.S. dollars.; ; German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ).; Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0.79 2016 | yearly | 1991 - 2016 |
View Uganda's Uganda UG: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter from 1991 to 2016 in the chart:
Uganda UG: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter
UG: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data was reported at 0.940 USD in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 1.400 USD for 2014. UG: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data is updated yearly, averaging 0.960 USD from Dec 1991 (Median) to 2016, with 12 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.420 USD in 2010 and a record low of 0.690 USD in 1991. UG: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uganda – Table UG.World Bank: Transportation. Fuel prices refer to the pump prices of the most widely sold grade of gasoline. Prices have been converted from the local currency to U.S. dollars.; ; German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ).; Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0.94 2016 | yearly | 1991 - 2016 |
View Uganda's Uganda UG: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter from 1991 to 2016 in the chart:
Uganda UG: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards
UG: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data was reported at 2.600 NA in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 2.500 NA for 2016. UG: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data is updated yearly, averaging 3.442 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2017, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.000 NA in 2007 and a record low of 2.500 NA in 2016. UG: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uganda – Table UG.World Bank: Transportation. The Quality of Port Infrastructure measures business executives' perception of their country's port facilities. Data are from the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey, conducted for 30 years in collaboration with 150 partner institutes. The 2009 round included more than 13,000 respondents from 133 countries. Sampling follows a dual stratification based on company size and the sector of activity. Data are collected online or through in-person interviews. Responses are aggregated using sector-weighted averaging. The data for the latest year are combined with the data for the previous year to create a two-year moving average. Scores range from 1 (port infrastructure considered extremely underdeveloped) to 7 (port infrastructure considered efficient by international standards). Respondents in landlocked countries were asked how accessible are port facilities (1 = extremely inaccessible; 7 = extremely accessible).; ; World Economic Forum, Global Competiveness Report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.60 2017 | yearly | 2007 - 2017 |