Uzbekistan Policy and Institutions

Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Business Regulatory Environment Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

2005 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: CPIA: Business Regulatory Environment Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 3.500 NA in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 3.000 NA for 2016. UZ: CPIA: Business Regulatory Environment Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 3.000 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2017, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.500 NA in 2017 and a record low of 2.500 NA in 2006. UZ: CPIA: Business Regulatory Environment Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank.WDI: Policy and Institutions. Business regulatory environment assesses the extent to which the legal, regulatory, and policy environments help or hinder private businesses in investing, creating jobs, and becoming more productive.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last Frequency Range
3.50 2017 yearly 2005 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Business Regulatory Environment Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Business Regulatory Environment Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Debt Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

2005 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: CPIA: Debt Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 4.500 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 4.500 NA for 2016. UZ: CPIA: Debt Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 4.000 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2017, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.500 NA in 2017 and a record low of 4.000 NA in 2015. UZ: CPIA: Debt Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank.WDI: Policy and Institutions. Debt policy assesses whether the debt management strategy is conducive to minimizing budgetary risks and ensuring long-term debt sustainability.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last Frequency Range
4.50 2017 yearly 2005 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Debt Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Debt Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Economic Management Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High

2005 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: CPIA: Economic Management Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 4.167 NA in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 4.167 NA for 2016. UZ: CPIA: Economic Management Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 4.000 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2017, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.167 NA in 2016 and a record low of 3.500 NA in 2006. UZ: CPIA: Economic Management Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank.WDI: Policy and Institutions. The economic management cluster includes macroeconomic management, fiscal policy, and debt policy.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last Frequency Range
4.17 2017 yearly 2005 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Economic Management Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Economic Management Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High

Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

2005 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: CPIA: Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 4.000 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 4.000 NA for 2016. UZ: CPIA: Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 3.500 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2017, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.000 NA in 2017 and a record low of 3.000 NA in 2007. UZ: CPIA: Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank.WDI: Policy and Institutions. Efficiency of revenue mobilization assesses the overall pattern of revenue mobilization--not only the de facto tax structure, but also revenue from all sources as actually collected.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last Frequency Range
4.00 2017 yearly 2005 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Equity of Public Resource Use Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

2005 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: CPIA: Equity of Public Resource Use Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 3.500 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 3.500 NA for 2016. UZ: CPIA: Equity of Public Resource Use Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 3.500 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2017, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.000 NA in 2013 and a record low of 3.500 NA in 2017. UZ: CPIA: Equity of Public Resource Use Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank.WDI: Policy and Institutions. Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last Frequency Range
3.50 2017 yearly 2005 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Equity of Public Resource Use Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Equity of Public Resource Use Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Financial Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

2005 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: CPIA: Financial Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 3.000 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 3.000 NA for 2016. UZ: CPIA: Financial Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 3.000 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2017, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.000 NA in 2017 and a record low of 2.500 NA in 2007. UZ: CPIA: Financial Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank.WDI: Policy and Institutions. Financial sector assesses the structure of the financial sector and the policies and regulations that affect it.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last Frequency Range
3.00 2017 yearly 2005 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Financial Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Financial Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Fiscal Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

2005 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: CPIA: Fiscal Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 4.000 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 4.000 NA for 2016. UZ: CPIA: Fiscal Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 4.000 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2017, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.000 NA in 2017 and a record low of 3.500 NA in 2007. UZ: CPIA: Fiscal Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank.WDI: Policy and Institutions. Fiscal policy assesses the short- and medium-term sustainability of fiscal policy (taking into account monetary and exchange rate policy and the sustainability of the public debt) and its impact on growth.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last Frequency Range
4.00 2017 yearly 2005 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Fiscal Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Fiscal Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Gender Equality Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

2005 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: CPIA: Gender Equality Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 4.000 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 4.000 NA for 2016. UZ: CPIA: Gender Equality Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 4.000 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2017, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.000 NA in 2017 and a record low of 3.500 NA in 2006. UZ: CPIA: Gender Equality Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank.WDI: Policy and Institutions. Gender equality assesses the extent to which the country has installed institutions and programs to enforce laws and policies that promote equal access for men and women in education, health, the economy, and protection under law.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last Frequency Range
4.00 2017 yearly 2005 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Gender Equality Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Gender Equality Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Macroeconomic Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

2005 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: CPIA: Macroeconomic Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 4.000 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 4.000 NA for 2016. UZ: CPIA: Macroeconomic Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 4.000 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2017, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.000 NA in 2017 and a record low of 3.000 NA in 2006. UZ: CPIA: Macroeconomic Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank.WDI: Policy and Institutions. Macroeconomic management assesses the monetary, exchange rate, and aggregate demand policy framework.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last Frequency Range
4.00 2017 yearly 2005 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Macroeconomic Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Macroeconomic Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High

2005 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: CPIA: Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 3.700 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 3.700 NA for 2016. UZ: CPIA: Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 3.700 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2017, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.800 NA in 2013 and a record low of 3.600 NA in 2006. UZ: CPIA: Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank.WDI: Policy and Institutions. The policies for social inclusion and equity cluster includes gender equality, equity of public resource use, building human resources, social protection and labor, and policies and institutions for environmental sustainability.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last Frequency Range
3.70 2017 yearly 2005 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High

Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Policy and Institutions For Environmental Sustainability Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

2005 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: CPIA: Policy and Institutions For Environmental Sustainability Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 3.500 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 3.500 NA for 2016. UZ: CPIA: Policy and Institutions For Environmental Sustainability Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 3.500 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2017, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.500 NA in 2017 and a record low of 3.500 NA in 2017. UZ: CPIA: Policy and Institutions For Environmental Sustainability Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. Policy and institutions for environmental sustainability assess the extent to which environmental policies foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last Frequency Range
3.50 2017 yearly 2005 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Policy and Institutions For Environmental Sustainability Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Policy and Institutions For Environmental Sustainability Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

2005 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: CPIA: Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 3.000 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 3.000 NA for 2016. UZ: CPIA: Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 2.500 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2017, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.000 NA in 2017 and a record low of 2.000 NA in 2006. UZ: CPIA: Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. Property rights and rule-based governance assess the extent to which private economic activity is facilitated by an effective legal system and rule-based governance structure in which property and contract rights are reliably respected and enforced.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last Frequency Range
3.00 2017 yearly 2005 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Public Sector Management and Institutions Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High

2005 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: CPIA: Public Sector Management and Institutions Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 3.200 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 3.200 NA for 2016. UZ: CPIA: Public Sector Management and Institutions Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 2.900 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2017, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.200 NA in 2017 and a record low of 2.400 NA in 2006. UZ: CPIA: Public Sector Management and Institutions Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. The public sector management and institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last Frequency Range
3.20 2017 yearly 2005 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Public Sector Management and Institutions Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Public Sector Management and Institutions Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High

Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Quality of Budgetary and Financial Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

2005 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: CPIA: Quality of Budgetary and Financial Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 4.000 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 4.000 NA for 2016. UZ: CPIA: Quality of Budgetary and Financial Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 3.500 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2017, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.000 NA in 2017 and a record low of 3.000 NA in 2008. UZ: CPIA: Quality of Budgetary and Financial Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. Quality of budgetary and financial management assesses the extent to which there is a comprehensive and credible budget linked to policy priorities, effective financial management systems, and timely and accurate accounting and fiscal reporting, including timely and audited public accounts.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last Frequency Range
4.00 2017 yearly 2005 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Quality of Budgetary and Financial Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Quality of Budgetary and Financial Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Quality of Public Administration Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

2005 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: CPIA: Quality of Public Administration Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 3.000 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 3.000 NA for 2016. UZ: CPIA: Quality of Public Administration Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 3.000 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2017, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.000 NA in 2017 and a record low of 2.500 NA in 2007. UZ: CPIA: Quality of Public Administration Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. Quality of public administration assesses the extent to which civilian central government staff is structured to design and implement government policy and deliver services effectively.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last Frequency Range
3.00 2017 yearly 2005 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Quality of Public Administration Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Quality of Public Administration Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Social Protection Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

2005 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: CPIA: Social Protection Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 3.500 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 3.500 NA for 2016. UZ: CPIA: Social Protection Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 3.500 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2017, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.500 NA in 2017 and a record low of 3.500 NA in 2017. UZ: CPIA: Social Protection Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. Social protection and labor assess government policies in social protection and labor market regulations that reduce the risk of becoming poor, assist those who are poor to better manage further risks, and ensure a minimal level of welfare to all people.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last Frequency Range
3.50 2017 yearly 2005 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Social Protection Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Social Protection Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Structural Policies Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High

2005 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: CPIA: Structural Policies Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 3.167 NA in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 2.833 NA for 2016. UZ: CPIA: Structural Policies Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 2.833 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2017, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.167 NA in 2017 and a record low of 2.500 NA in 2006. UZ: CPIA: Structural Policies Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. The structural policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last Frequency Range
3.17 2017 yearly 2005 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Structural Policies Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Structural Policies Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High

Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Trade Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

2005 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: CPIA: Trade Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 3.000 NA in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 2.500 NA for 2016. UZ: CPIA: Trade Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 2.500 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2017, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.000 NA in 2017 and a record low of 2.500 NA in 2016. UZ: CPIA: Trade Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank.WDI: Policy and Institutions. Trade assesses how the policy framework fosters trade in goods.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last Frequency Range
3.00 2017 yearly 2005 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Trade Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Trade Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Transparency: Accountability: and Corruption in The Public Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

2005 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: CPIA: Transparency: Accountability: and Corruption in The Public Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 2.000 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 2.000 NA for 2016. UZ: CPIA: Transparency: Accountability: and Corruption in The Public Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 2.000 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2017, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.000 NA in 2017 and a record low of 1.500 NA in 2010. UZ: CPIA: Transparency: Accountability: and Corruption in The Public Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector assess the extent to which the executive can be held accountable for its use of funds and for the results of its actions by the electorate and by the legislature and judiciary, and the extent to which public employees within the executive are required to account for administrative decisions, use of resources, and results obtained. The three main dimensions assessed here are the accountability of the executive to oversight institutions and of public employees for their performance, access of civil society to information on public affairs, and state capture by narrow vested interests.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last Frequency Range
2.00 2017 yearly 2005 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Transparency: Accountability: and Corruption in The Public Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: CPIA: Transparency: Accountability: and Corruption in The Public Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Uzbekistan UZ: Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA): Building Human Resources Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

2005 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA): Building Human Resources Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 4.000 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 4.000 NA for 2016. UZ: Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA): Building Human Resources Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 4.000 NA from Dec 2005 (Median) to 2017, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.000 NA in 2017 and a record low of 4.000 NA in 2017. UZ: Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA): Building Human Resources Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. Building human resources assesses the national policies and public and private sector service delivery that affect the access to and quality of health and education services, including prevention and treatment of HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last Frequency Range
4.00 2017 yearly 2005 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA): Building Human Resources Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2005 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA): Building Human Resources Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Uzbekistan UZ: Law Mandates Equal Remuneration for Females & Males for Work of Equal Value: 1=Yes; 0=No

2013 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: Law Mandates Equal Remuneration for Females & Males for Work of Equal Value: 1=Yes; 0=No data was reported at 0.000 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 0.000 NA for 2015. UZ: Law Mandates Equal Remuneration for Females & Males for Work of Equal Value: 1=Yes; 0=No data is updated yearly, averaging 0.000 NA from Dec 2013 (Median) to 2017, with 3 observations. UZ: Law Mandates Equal Remuneration for Females & Males for Work of Equal Value: 1=Yes; 0=No data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. Law mandates equal remuneration for females and males for work of equal value is whether there is a law that obligates employers to pay equal remuneration to male and female employees who do work of equal value.“Remuneration” refers to the ordinary, basic or minimum wage or salary and any additional emoluments payable directly or indirectly, whether in cash or in kind, by the employer to the worker and arising out of the worker’s employment. “Work of equal value” refers not only to the same or similar jobs but also to different jobs of the same value.; ; World Bank: Women, Business and the Law.; ;

Last Frequency Range
0.00 2017 yearly 2013 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: Law Mandates Equal Remuneration for Females & Males for Work of Equal Value: 1=Yes; 0=No from 2013 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: Law Mandates Equal Remuneration for Females & Males for Work of Equal Value: 1=Yes; 0=No

Uzbekistan UZ: Law Mandates Nondiscrimination Based on Gender in Hiring: 1=Yes; 0=No

2009 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: Law Mandates Nondiscrimination Based on Gender in Hiring: 1=Yes; 0=No data was reported at 0.000 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 0.000 NA for 2015. UZ: Law Mandates Nondiscrimination Based on Gender in Hiring: 1=Yes; 0=No data is updated yearly, averaging 0.000 NA from Dec 2009 (Median) to 2017, with 5 observations. UZ: Law Mandates Nondiscrimination Based on Gender in Hiring: 1=Yes; 0=No data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. Law mandates nondiscrimination based on gender in hiring is whether the law specifically prevents or penalizes gender-based discrimination in the hiring process; the law may prohibit discrimination in employment on the basis of gender but be silent about whether job applicants are protected from discrimination. Hiring refers to the process of employing a person for wages and making a selection by presenting a candidate with a job offer. Job advertisements, selection criteria and recruitment, although equally important, are not considered “hiring” for purposes of this question.; ; World Bank: Women, Business and the Law.; ;

Last Frequency Range
0.00 2017 yearly 2009 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: Law Mandates Nondiscrimination Based on Gender in Hiring: 1=Yes; 0=No from 2009 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: Law Mandates Nondiscrimination Based on Gender in Hiring: 1=Yes; 0=No

Uzbekistan UZ: Law Mandates Paid or Unpaid Maternity Leave: 1=Yes; 0=No

2009 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: Law Mandates Paid or Unpaid Maternity Leave: 1=Yes; 0=No data was reported at 1.000 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 1.000 NA for 2015. UZ: Law Mandates Paid or Unpaid Maternity Leave: 1=Yes; 0=No data is updated yearly, averaging 1.000 NA from Dec 2009 (Median) to 2017, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.000 NA in 2017 and a record low of 1.000 NA in 2017. UZ: Law Mandates Paid or Unpaid Maternity Leave: 1=Yes; 0=No data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. Law mandates paid or unpaid maternity leave is whether there is a law mandating paid or unpaid maternity leave available only to the mother. Provisions for circumstantial leave by which an employee is entitled to a certain number of days of paid leave (usually fewer than five days) upon the birth of a child are considered paternity leave; even if the law is gender-neutral, such leave is not considered maternity leave if the law covers maternity leave elsewhere.; ; World Bank: Women, Business and the Law.; ;

Last Frequency Range
1.00 2017 yearly 2009 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: Law Mandates Paid or Unpaid Maternity Leave: 1=Yes; 0=No from 2009 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: Law Mandates Paid or Unpaid Maternity Leave: 1=Yes; 0=No

Uzbekistan UZ: Law Prohibits or Invalidates Child or Early Marriage: 1=Yes; 0=No

2015 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: Law Prohibits or Invalidates Child or Early Marriage: 1=Yes; 0=No data was reported at 1.000 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 1.000 NA for 2015. UZ: Law Prohibits or Invalidates Child or Early Marriage: 1=Yes; 0=No data is updated yearly, averaging 1.000 NA from Dec 2015 (Median) to 2017, with 2 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.000 NA in 2017 and a record low of 1.000 NA in 2017. UZ: Law Prohibits or Invalidates Child or Early Marriage: 1=Yes; 0=No data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. Law prohibits or invalidates child or early marriage is whether there are provisions that prevent the marriage of girls, boys, or both before they reach the legal age of marriage or the age of marriage with consent, including, for example, a prohibition on registering the marriage or provisions stating that such a marriage is null and void.; ; World Bank: Women, Business and the Law.; ;

Last Frequency Range
1.00 2017 yearly 2015 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: Law Prohibits or Invalidates Child or Early Marriage: 1=Yes; 0=No from 2015 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: Law Prohibits or Invalidates Child or Early Marriage: 1=Yes; 0=No

Uzbekistan UZ: Legislation Exists on Domestic Violence: 1=Yes; 0=No

2013 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: Legislation Exists on Domestic Violence: 1=Yes; 0=No data was reported at 0.000 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 0.000 NA for 2015. UZ: Legislation Exists on Domestic Violence: 1=Yes; 0=No data is updated yearly, averaging 0.000 NA from Dec 2013 (Median) to 2017, with 3 observations. UZ: Legislation Exists on Domestic Violence: 1=Yes; 0=No data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. Legislation exists on domestic violence is whether there is legislation addressing domestic violence: violence between spouses, within the family or members of the same household, or in interpersonal relationships, including intimate partner violence that is subject to criminal sanctions or provides for protection orders for domestic violence, or the legislation addresses “cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment” or “harassment” that clearly affects physical or mental health, and it is implied that such behavior is considered domestic violence.; ; World Bank: Women, Business and the Law.; ;

Last Frequency Range
0.00 2017 yearly 2013 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: Legislation Exists on Domestic Violence: 1=Yes; 0=No from 2013 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: Legislation Exists on Domestic Violence: 1=Yes; 0=No

Uzbekistan UZ: Mothers are Guaranteed an Equivalent Position After Maternity Leave: 1=Yes; 0=No

2009 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: Mothers are Guaranteed an Equivalent Position After Maternity Leave: 1=Yes; 0=No data was reported at 1.000 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 1.000 NA for 2015. UZ: Mothers are Guaranteed an Equivalent Position After Maternity Leave: 1=Yes; 0=No data is updated yearly, averaging 1.000 NA from Dec 2009 (Median) to 2017, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.000 NA in 2017 and a record low of 1.000 NA in 2017. UZ: Mothers are Guaranteed an Equivalent Position After Maternity Leave: 1=Yes; 0=No data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. Mothers are guaranteed an equivalent position after maternity leave is whether employers of women returning from maternity leave are legally obligated to provide them with an equivalent position after maternity leave. It takes into account paid and unpaid maternity leave and captures whether the employer has a legal obligation to reinstate the returning employee in an equivalent or better position and salary than the employee had pre-leave. Where the maternity leave regime explicitly states that the employee may not be indefinitely replaced, the answer is assumed to be “Yes.” Where the maternity leave regime explicitly establishes a suspension of the employee’s contract, the answer is assumed to be “Yes.” In economies that also have parental leave and the law guarantees return after the leave to the same or an equivalent position paid at the same rate but is silent on guaranteeing the same position after maternity leave, the answer is “Yes.” The answer is “N/A” if no paid or unpaid maternity leave is available.; ; World Bank: Women, Business and the Law.; ;

Last Frequency Range
1.00 2017 yearly 2009 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: Mothers are Guaranteed an Equivalent Position After Maternity Leave: 1=Yes; 0=No from 2009 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: Mothers are Guaranteed an Equivalent Position After Maternity Leave: 1=Yes; 0=No

Uzbekistan UZ: Nondiscrimination Clause Mentions Gender in the Constitution: 1=Yes; 0=No

2009 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: Nondiscrimination Clause Mentions Gender in the Constitution: 1=Yes; 0=No data was reported at 1.000 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 1.000 NA for 2015. UZ: Nondiscrimination Clause Mentions Gender in the Constitution: 1=Yes; 0=No data is updated yearly, averaging 1.000 NA from Dec 2009 (Median) to 2017, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.000 NA in 2017 and a record low of 1.000 NA in 2017. UZ: Nondiscrimination Clause Mentions Gender in the Constitution: 1=Yes; 0=No data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. Nondiscrimination clause mentions gender in the constitution is whether there is a nondiscrimination clause in the constitution which mentions gender. For the answer to be “Yes,” the constitution must use either the word discrimination or the word nondiscrimination or even when there is a “clawback” provision granting exceptions to the nondiscrimination clause for certain areas of the law, such as inheritance, family and customary law. The answer is “No” if there is no nondiscrimination provision, or the nondiscrimination language is present in the preamble but not in an article of the constitution, or there is a provision that merely stipulates that the sexes are equal, or the sexes have equal rights and obligations. The answer is 'N/A' if there is no nondiscrimination provision.; ; World Bank: Women, Business and the Law.; ;

Last Frequency Range
1.00 2017 yearly 2009 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: Nondiscrimination Clause Mentions Gender in the Constitution: 1=Yes; 0=No from 2009 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: Nondiscrimination Clause Mentions Gender in the Constitution: 1=Yes; 0=No

Uzbekistan UZ: Nonpregnant and Nonnursing Women Can Do the Same Jobs as Men: 1=Yes; 0=No

2009 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

UZ: Nonpregnant and Nonnursing Women Can Do the Same Jobs as Men: 1=Yes; 0=No data was reported at 0.000 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 0.000 NA for 2015. UZ: Nonpregnant and Nonnursing Women Can Do the Same Jobs as Men: 1=Yes; 0=No data is updated yearly, averaging 0.000 NA from Dec 2009 (Median) to 2017, with 5 observations. UZ: Nonpregnant and Nonnursing Women Can Do the Same Jobs as Men: 1=Yes; 0=No data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. Non-pregnant and non-nursing women can do the same jobs as men indicates whether there are specific jobs that women explicitly or implicitly cannot perform except in limited circumstances. Both partial and full restrictions on women’s work are counted as restrictions. For example, if women are only allowed to work in certain jobs within the mining industry, e.g., as health care professionals within mines but not as miners, this is a restriction.; ; World Bank: Women, Business and the Law.; ;

Last Frequency Range
0.00 2017 yearly 2009 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: Nonpregnant and Nonnursing Women Can Do the Same Jobs as Men: 1=Yes; 0=No from 2009 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: Nonpregnant and Nonnursing Women Can Do the Same Jobs as Men: 1=Yes; 0=No

Uzbekistan UZ: Proportion of Seats Held by Women in National Parliaments

1997 - 2017 | Yearly | % | World Bank

UZ: Proportion of Seats Held by Women in National Parliaments data was reported at 16.000 % in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 16.000 % for 2016. UZ: Proportion of Seats Held by Women in National Parliaments data is updated yearly, averaging 17.500 % from Dec 1997 (Median) to 2017, with 20 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 22.000 % in 2014 and a record low of 6.000 % in 1998. UZ: Proportion of Seats Held by Women in National Parliaments data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Uzbekistan – Table UZ.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. Women in parliaments are the percentage of parliamentary seats in a single or lower chamber held by women.; ; Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) (www.ipu.org).; Weighted average; General cut off date is end-December. Relevance to gender indicator: Women are vastly underrepresented in decision making positions in government, although there is some evidence of recent improvement. Gender parity in parliamentary representation is still far from being realized. Without representation at this level, it is difficult for women to influence policy.

Last Frequency Range
16.00 2017 yearly 1997 - 2017

View Uzbekistan's Uzbekistan UZ: Proportion of Seats Held by Women in National Parliaments from 1997 to 2017 in the chart:

Uzbekistan Uzbekistan UZ: Proportion of Seats Held by Women in National Parliaments
UZ: CPIA: Business Regulatory Environment Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
UZ: CPIA: Debt Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
UZ: CPIA: Economic Management Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High
UZ: CPIA: Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
UZ: CPIA: Equity of Public Resource Use Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
UZ: CPIA: Financial Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
UZ: CPIA: Fiscal Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
UZ: CPIA: Gender Equality Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
UZ: CPIA: Macroeconomic Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
UZ: CPIA: Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High
UZ: CPIA: Policy and Institutions For Environmental Sustainability Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
UZ: CPIA: Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
UZ: CPIA: Public Sector Management and Institutions Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High
UZ: CPIA: Quality of Budgetary and Financial Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
UZ: CPIA: Quality of Public Administration Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
UZ: CPIA: Social Protection Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
UZ: CPIA: Structural Policies Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High
UZ: CPIA: Trade Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
UZ: CPIA: Transparency: Accountability: and Corruption in The Public Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
UZ: Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA): Building Human Resources Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
UZ: Law Mandates Equal Remuneration for Females & Males for Work of Equal Value: 1=Yes; 0=No
UZ: Law Mandates Nondiscrimination Based on Gender in Hiring: 1=Yes; 0=No
UZ: Law Mandates Paid or Unpaid Maternity Leave: 1=Yes; 0=No
UZ: Law Prohibits or Invalidates Child or Early Marriage: 1=Yes; 0=No
UZ: Legislation Exists on Domestic Violence: 1=Yes; 0=No
UZ: Mothers are Guaranteed an Equivalent Position After Maternity Leave: 1=Yes; 0=No
UZ: Nondiscrimination Clause Mentions Gender in the Constitution: 1=Yes; 0=No
UZ: Nonpregnant and Nonnursing Women Can Do the Same Jobs as Men: 1=Yes; 0=No
UZ: Proportion of Seats Held by Women in National Parliaments
Unlimited access tailored to your data needs
Flexible monthly access to CEIC data