Malaysia Transportation
Malaysia Air Transport: Freight
MY: Air Transport: Freight data was reported at 1,261.637 Ton-km mn in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 1,149.877 Ton-km mn for 2016. MY: Air Transport: Freight data is updated yearly, averaging 780.400 Ton-km mn from Dec 1970 (Median) to 2017, with 48 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2,853.263 Ton-km mn in 2009 and a record low of 8.300 Ton-km mn in 1973. MY: Air Transport: Freight data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table MY.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Air freight is the volume of freight, express, and diplomatic bags carried on each flight stage (operation of an aircraft from takeoff to its next landing), measured in metric tons times kilometers traveled.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 1,261.637 2017 | yearly | 1970 - 2017 |
View Malaysia's Malaysia Air Transport: Freight from 1970 to 2017 in the chart:
Malaysia Air Transport: Passengers Carried
MY: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data was reported at 58,188,823.000 Person in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 53,817,353.000 Person for 2016. MY: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data is updated yearly, averaging 13,377,850.000 Person from Dec 1970 (Median) to 2017, with 48 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 58,188,823.000 Person in 2017 and a record low of 748,900.000 Person in 1970. MY: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table MY.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Air passengers carried include both domestic and international aircraft passengers of air carriers registered in the country.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 58,188,823.000 2017 | yearly | 1970 - 2017 |
View Malaysia's Malaysia Air Transport: Passengers Carried from 1970 to 2017 in the chart:
Malaysia Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide
MY: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data was reported at 432,454.000 Unit in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 447,001.000 Unit for 2016. MY: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data is updated yearly, averaging 164,650.000 Unit from Dec 1970 (Median) to 2017, with 48 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 463,740.000 Unit in 2015 and a record low of 27,700.000 Unit in 1970. MY: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table MY.World Bank: Transportation. Registered carrier departures worldwide are domestic takeoffs and takeoffs abroad of air carriers registered in the country.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 432,454.000 2017 | yearly | 1970 - 2017 |
View Malaysia's Malaysia Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide from 1970 to 2017 in the chart:
Malaysia Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient
MY: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data was reported at 5.100 NA in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 5.200 NA for 2016. MY: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data is updated yearly, averaging 5.000 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2017, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 5.200 NA in 2016 and a record low of 4.766 NA in 2009. MY: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Malaysia – Table MY.World Bank: Transportation. Burden of Customs Procedure measures business executives' perceptions of their country's efficiency of customs procedures. The rating ranges from 1 to 7, with a higher score indicating greater efficiency. Data are from the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey, conducted for 30 years in collaboration with 150 partner institutes. The 2009 round included more than 13,000 respondents from 133 countries. Sampling follows a dual stratification based on company size and the sector of activity. Data are collected online or through in-person interviews. Responses are aggregated using sector-weighted averaging. The data for the latest year are combined with the data for the previous year to create a two-year moving average. Respondents evaluated the efficiency of customs procedures in their country. The lowest score (1) rates the customs procedure as extremely inefficient, and the highest score (7) as extremely efficient.; ; World Economic Forum, Global Competiveness Report and data files.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 5.100 2017 | yearly | 2007 - 2017 |
View Malaysia's Malaysia Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient from 2007 to 2017 in the chart:
Malaysia Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units)
MY: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) data was reported at 24,719,000.000 TEU in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 24,570,000.000 TEU for 2016. MY: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) data is updated yearly, averaging 16,008,376.479 TEU from Dec 2000 (Median) to 2017, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 24,719,000.000 TEU in 2017 and a record low of 4,642,428.000 TEU in 2000. MY: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Malaysia – Table MY.World Bank: Transportation. Port container traffic measures the flow of containers from land to sea transport modes., and vice versa, in twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs), a standard-size container. Data refer to coastal shipping as well as international journeys. Transshipment traffic is counted as two lifts at the intermediate port (once to off-load and again as an outbound lift) and includes empty units.; ; UNCTAD (http://unctad.org/en/Pages/statistics.aspx); Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 24,719,000.000 2017 | yearly | 2000 - 2017 |
View Malaysia's Malaysia Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) from 2000 to 2017 in the chart:
Malaysia Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100
MY: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 data was reported at 106.790 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 110.580 NA for 2015. MY: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 data is updated yearly, averaging 88.140 NA from Dec 2004 (Median) to 2016, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 110.580 NA in 2015 and a record low of 62.830 NA in 2004. MY: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Malaysia – Table MY.World Bank: Transportation. The Liner Shipping Connectivity Index captures how well countries are connected to global shipping networks. It is computed by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) based on five components of the maritime transport sector: number of ships, their container-carrying capacity, maximum vessel size, number of services, and number of companies that deploy container ships in a country's ports. For each component a country's value is divided by the maximum value of each component in 2004, the five components are averaged for each country, and the average is divided by the maximum average for 2004 and multiplied by 100. The index generates a value of 100 for the country with the highest average index in 2004. . The underlying data come from Containerisation International Online.; ; United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Review of Maritime Transport 2010.; ;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 106.790 2016 | yearly | 2004 - 2016 |
View Malaysia's Malaysia Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 from 2004 to 2016 in the chart:
Malaysia Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments
MY: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data was reported at 3.461 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.582 NA for 2014. MY: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data is updated yearly, averaging 3.510 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.582 NA in 2014 and a record low of 3.320 NA in 2010. MY: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Malaysia – Table MY.World Bank: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the ability to track and trace consignments when shipping to the market, on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.461 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Malaysia's Malaysia Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Malaysia Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services
MY: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data was reported at 3.342 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.466 NA for 2014. MY: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data is updated yearly, averaging 3.400 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.466 NA in 2014 and a record low of 3.340 NA in 2010. MY: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Malaysia – Table MY.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the overall level of competence and quality of logistics services (e.g. transport operators, customs brokers), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.342 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Malaysia's Malaysia Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Malaysia Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments
MY: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data was reported at 3.482 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.644 NA for 2014. MY: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data is updated yearly, averaging 3.482 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.644 NA in 2014 and a record low of 3.360 NA in 2007. MY: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Malaysia – Table MY.World Bank: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents assessed the ease of arranging competitively priced shipments to markets, on a rating ranging from 1 (very difficult) to 5 (very easy). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.482 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Malaysia's Malaysia Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Malaysia Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process
MY: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data was reported at 3.167 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.368 NA for 2014. MY: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data is updated yearly, averaging 3.280 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.368 NA in 2014 and a record low of 3.110 NA in 2010. MY: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Malaysia – Table MY.World Bank: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated efficiency of customs clearance processes (i.e. speed, simplicity and predictability of formalities), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.167 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Malaysia's Malaysia Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Malaysia Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time
MY: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data was reported at 3.653 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.917 NA for 2014. MY: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data is updated yearly, averaging 3.860 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.950 NA in 2007 and a record low of 3.653 NA in 2016. MY: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Malaysia – Table MY.World Bank: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents assessed how often the shipments to assessed markets reach the consignee within the scheduled or expected delivery time, on a rating ranging from 1 (hardly ever) to 5 (nearly always). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.653 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Malaysia's Malaysia Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Malaysia Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall
MY: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data was reported at 3.426 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.590 NA for 2014. MY: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data is updated yearly, averaging 3.480 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.590 NA in 2014 and a record low of 3.426 NA in 2016. MY: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Malaysia – Table MY.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Logistics Performance Index overall score reflects perceptions of a country's logistics based on efficiency of customs clearance process, quality of trade- and transport-related infrastructure, ease of arranging competitively priced shipments, quality of logistics services, ability to track and trace consignments, and frequency with which shipments reach the consignee within the scheduled time. The index ranges from 1 to 5, with a higher score representing better performance. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Scores for the six areas are averaged across all respondents and aggregated to a single score using principal components analysis. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010).; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.426 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Malaysia's Malaysia Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Malaysia Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure
MY: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data was reported at 3.448 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.559 NA for 2014. MY: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data is updated yearly, averaging 3.448 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.559 NA in 2014 and a record low of 3.330 NA in 2007. MY: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Malaysia – Table MY.World Bank: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the quality of trade and transport related infrastructure (e.g. ports, railroads, roads, information technology), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.448 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Malaysia's Malaysia Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Malaysia Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter
MY: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data was reported at 0.440 USD in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 0.650 USD for 2014. MY: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data is updated yearly, averaging 0.330 USD from Dec 1991 (Median) to 2016, with 12 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 0.650 USD in 2014 and a record low of 0.160 USD in 2000. MY: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Malaysia – Table MY.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Fuel prices refer to the pump prices of the most widely sold grade of diesel fuel. Prices have been converted from the local currency to U.S. dollars.; ; German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ).; Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0.440 2016 | yearly | 1991 - 2016 |
View Malaysia's Malaysia Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter from 1991 to 2016 in the chart:
Malaysia Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter
MY: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data was reported at 0.450 USD in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 0.680 USD for 2014. MY: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data is updated yearly, averaging 0.435 USD from Dec 1991 (Median) to 2016, with 12 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 0.680 USD in 2014 and a record low of 0.280 USD in 2000. MY: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Malaysia – Table MY.World Bank: Transportation. Fuel prices refer to the pump prices of the most widely sold grade of gasoline. Prices have been converted from the local currency to U.S. dollars.; ; German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ).; Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0.450 2016 | yearly | 1991 - 2016 |
View Malaysia's Malaysia Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter from 1991 to 2016 in the chart:
Malaysia Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards
MY: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data was reported at 5.400 NA in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 5.600 NA for 2016. MY: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data is updated yearly, averaging 5.577 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2017, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 5.720 NA in 2007 and a record low of 5.400 NA in 2017. MY: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Malaysia – Table MY.World Bank: Transportation. The Quality of Port Infrastructure measures business executives' perception of their country's port facilities. Data are from the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey, conducted for 30 years in collaboration with 150 partner institutes. The 2009 round included more than 13,000 respondents from 133 countries. Sampling follows a dual stratification based on company size and the sector of activity. Data are collected online or through in-person interviews. Responses are aggregated using sector-weighted averaging. The data for the latest year are combined with the data for the previous year to create a two-year moving average. Scores range from 1 (port infrastructure considered extremely underdeveloped) to 7 (port infrastructure considered efficient by international standards). Respondents in landlocked countries were asked how accessible are port facilities (1 = extremely inaccessible; 7 = extremely accessible).; ; World Economic Forum, Global Competiveness Report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 5.400 2017 | yearly | 2007 - 2017 |
View Malaysia's Malaysia Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards from 2007 to 2017 in the chart:
Malaysia Rail Lines: Total Route-Km
MY: Rail Lines: Total Route-Km data was reported at 2,250.000 km in 2014. This stayed constant from the previous number of 2,250.000 km for 2013. MY: Rail Lines: Total Route-Km data is updated yearly, averaging 1,668.000 km from Dec 1980 (Median) to 2014, with 34 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2,250.000 km in 2014 and a record low of 1,622.000 km in 2000. MY: Rail Lines: Total Route-Km data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Malaysia – Table MY.World Bank: Transportation. Rail lines are the length of railway route available for train service, irrespective of the number of parallel tracks.; ; Internation Union of Railways (UIC); Sum; Aggregates are based on gap-filled data.
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2,250.000 2014 | yearly | 1980 - 2014 |
View Malaysia's Malaysia Rail Lines: Total Route-Km from 1980 to 2014 in the chart:
Malaysia Railways: Goods Transported
MY: Railways: Goods Transported data was reported at 3,071.000 Ton-km mn in 2014. This stayed constant from the previous number of 3,071.000 Ton-km mn for 2013. MY: Railways: Goods Transported data is updated yearly, averaging 1,361.137 Ton-km mn from Dec 1986 (Median) to 2014, with 25 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3,071.000 Ton-km mn in 2014 and a record low of 907.000 Ton-km mn in 2000. MY: Railways: Goods Transported data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Malaysia – Table MY.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Goods transported by railway are the volume of goods transported by railway, measured in metric tons times kilometers traveled.; ; Internation Union of Railways (UIC); Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3,071.000 2014 | yearly | 1986 - 2014 |
View Malaysia's Malaysia Railways: Goods Transported from 1986 to 2014 in the chart:
Malaysia Railways: Passengers Carried
MY: Railways: Passengers Carried data was reported at 3,293.000 Person-km mn in 2014. This stayed constant from the previous number of 3,293.000 Person-km mn for 2013. MY: Railways: Passengers Carried data is updated yearly, averaging 1,522.528 Person-km mn from Dec 1986 (Median) to 2014, with 28 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3,293.000 Person-km mn in 2014 and a record low of 965.000 Person-km mn in 2011. MY: Railways: Passengers Carried data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Malaysia – Table MY.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Passengers carried by railway are the number of passengers transported by rail times kilometers traveled.; ; Internation Union of Railways (UIC); Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3,293.000 2014 | yearly | 1986 - 2014 |